The Common Read

Many campuses use some form of common read, but I think that our campus and others have had various experiences with how useful and generally engaging the read has been.

I first encountered the Common Read at the University of South Dakota. The Read was limited to incoming Honors students, about 120-150 students. I find that limitation elitist, but the University did a great job engaging students. Early in the first semester, freshman Honors students were invited by the President to a dinner. Each table had a discussion leader-a faculty or staff member who had read the book and prepared for the discussion. A wonderful engagement of students, faculty, and staff in an intellectual community. I could only wish it were broader and even more sustained.

The University of Idaho did a wonderful job selecting books, and always brought the author to campus, usually in Fall. All students were expected to read the book, and faculty were urged to use the book in their first year seminars. Authors visited campus, engaging with faculty and students. Authors had a small dinner with the President, which my wife and I always found special, though perhaps a bit too exclusive. The day was capped by a public presentation. Most memorable was the presentation by Tara Westover of her book, “Educated”. A memoir set in Idaho and dealing with many issues, including what it means to become educated. The talk engaged the Moscow community, who filled the 600 seats in our ballroom…leaving about 400 spots on the floor for students who came minutes before the talk. A great evening, but I think we need to think of ways to make these occasions even more engaging-for faculty, staff, students, and community.

I’d love to hear experiences on other campuses-please comment!

Honor scholarship across campus

Many universities are trying to enhance their research stature; usually this is measured by NSF-reported research expenditures. Unfortunately, a simple measure like this leaves many faculty members, particularly those in the arts, feeling left out.

My Vice President for Research and Economic Development, Janet Nelson, did a great job addressing this concern with two simple, complementary, and engaging programs. First, sponsor a mini grant program focused on arts and other disciplines unable to attract major extramural support. Though $5000 might buy only 1% of a major NMR, it could-for example-build the world’s only 5-string cello (now at the University of Idaho). Who amongst us science nerds realized that Bach had written suites for the 5-string cello that had not been heard for hundreds of years? Well, Miranda Wilson at the University of Idaho knew this…and now you CAN hear those pieces because she was the recipient of a mini grant.

And, where did the contemporary world first hear those pieces…at an interdisciplinary “Short and Sweet” research symposium. These symposia typically had 5-8 talks of about 5 minutes. Topics spanned the five string cello to fire science at the urban-wild interface. An afternoon symposium and light refreshment (yes, we did provide wine) drew a very interdisciplinary crowd-much more interested than most of our 1-hour, professional talks.

University art…for those without traditional collections

Art enriches our lives and our campuses. Though most larger campuses have a museum, many people on campus won’t visit. The University of South Dakota used an unusual way to ensure that art was visible across campus: they collected masterworks from each graduating BFA and MFA student, and exhibited them in offices and classroom buildings across campus.

The USD approach served multiple purposes. The Art Department did not have room to store all of the art-but universities have a lot of office and classroom building spaces. Art was more visible across campus, and I think encouraged participation in organized gallery events, as well.

Some might be concerned about vandalism-I never saw it. I think that people respect art. Though I understand that the Mona Lisa may need more protection than a painting by Joe Smith, Class of ‘72…this never seemed to be a problem.

We did not adopt this at Idaho, just something that never quite made the list. But, we enjoyed exhibitions of student art in the Art and Architecture Building, and we also started a “President and Provost Collection” that we planned to hang in the Administration Building. I am not sure the new administration is as committed to that idea, but I think it remains a positive step in popularizing the arts on campus.

International Students

Most research universities bring international graduate students to campus as part of the research effort and recruitment and engagement is typically through those programs.

Undergraduate international students bring cultural diversity to campus, but they are also a source of full-pay tuition. Some universities have very successful programs built on years of international engagement by faculty (Michigan State is one example) or international prominence (Ivy Leagues, Stanford). How can a moderately resourced university recruit international students?

I suggest two ways to consider boosting international enrollment for schools that cannot invest heavily in a broad-based international recruitment program. First, seek unique and impactful interactions that can be specific draws. These may center around a particular world-class program or a faculty member with strong ties to a university in another country. Second, consider a long term partnership with a pathways provider such as InToo or Navitas.

The University of Idaho investigated both possibilities and ultimately settled on Navitas. Navitas provides two related services as part of the partnership. The University of Idaho has benefitted from both.

First, they have a network of 300 recruitment agents in 20 worldwide offices that serve 120 countries. These agents represent many different universities; don’t expect exclusive access. But, you can expect a stream of students whom Navitas directs to your best programs or students who are a good fit for your university. This is just a zero-cost means of extending our reach with a recruitment arm that we could not possibly afford. Of course, effort is required every year on the part of the University and Navitas to ensure that your program is visible to the agents. And, there is a fuzzy line between how these agents recruit students and other agents that students may be working with in their home country.

Second, Navitas provides an on-campus pathways program for students whose English is not yet sufficient for direct study. Once these students are ready to study in the US, they may leave, but many will remain at your institution, having made ties and become familiar with it, perhaps even having taken a few classes already. The University of Idaho receives a small share of the tuition from the pathways program, but all tuition from students enrolled in our own courses.

Since engaging with Navitas, we have seen roughly a doubling of the undergraduate international students entering as freshmen with excellent diversity in terms of countries represented (an all-eggs-in-one-basket approach can be ruinous if reputational or immigration problems arise). Additionally, about ½ of the pathways students matriculate into the University.

Of course, getting the students into your university is just the first step. Ensuring that they are supported personally and culturally is important to sustained success. A good deal of that support will come from an international student office, which must be established and resourced. Without pandering to the students, a concierge model is quite important. Among the personal steps we have taken are engaging with student clubs and events like Africa night, Nepali night, etc. Our experience is that international students are very appreciative of presidential engagement with their culture. We have also participated in a friendship families program in which students are “fostered” by community members. Of course, none of these engagements can substitute for academic excellence and genuine support and value.

Engaging students

One of the unique and fun ways I engaged students while President (and before that, as Provost) was challenging the student body to a racquetball match. I offered free lunch to any student (and a few friends) who could beat me in racquetball. Though my game is not what it once was, I have lost to only one student in over 10 years of this standing challenge (he was a scholarship tennis athlete whose father has been the over-50 champion in Mexico!).

The challenge has been fun for me, and a bit of a legend on campus. You may have another sport in which you like to engage…I also have been bicycling with the cycling club, for example. These are ways to humanize you as a person, not just a president, in a healthy manner.

Of course, I also played faculty and staff…losing to both our campus recreation director and to one of our tennis coaches. Again, an engagement opportunity that is fun for everyone.

My wife would remind me, though, that one has to be careful not to be too cocky or boastful…and I may have erred there on occasion. Scheduling matches and contact was handled by the President’s Office…and I recall hearing that one student reported back that, “it was the most fun, absolute beat down” he had ever experienced.